PreciseInfo presents: Programmer's Goldmine Collections
Pushing this button helps seeing this site without ads.
If you have problems with some mirror, try a different one.
Note: The system is updated regularly.
With each update, the articles may be different and so is their count
in each chapter.
The Bottom Line is simple:
You can get to the bottom of it within minutes, if not seconds,
without wasting a lot of time on reading totally irrelevant info
and getting a grand headache at that.
Our extensive collection goes back several years and
contains hundreds of books worth of material. It is a snapshot
of the state of the art in software development at this
Combined with stunning precision of our filters, the net
"if we don't have it, it probably does not exist".
Collections include tens of thousands of code examples and snippets
on any conceivable topic related to Java, C++, MFC, VC (Visual C),
ATL, STL, etc.
The expert chapters give you unprecedented amount of most
useful information on advanced programming techniques and
methods that would take you days if not weeks to find
On the top of it, you can learn plenty of sophisticated
tricks, used by experts and pros and get an in-depth
understanding of some subtle points.
Depth and breath of scope, combined with precision,
is unlike anything you have ever experienced
any place for any money.
Vast majority of things you are trying to do,
have already been done by someone.
In most cases, all you need is to be able to find it quickly,
and, preferably, copy/paste some code,
and that is exactly where Goldmine Collections come in.
If you spend an hour a day for 3 to 6 months on any
Goldmine site, you will become an expert yourself,
and your salary is going to go up considerably
with the next review.
You like THAT part, eh? :--}
That is all there is to it.
Stunning filtering precision
Our unique filters provide virtually infinite precision,
no search engine can possibly match.
With semantic filtering, the amount of "not on topic"
articles has been reduced by orders of magnitude.
In the Code chapters, you are pretty much guaranteed that all
the code snippets and examples correspond to a chapter topic,
with very few exceptions.
This fact alone, makes the Goldmine collections probably the best
educational and research material you can possibly hope to find
as it provides multiple views on any topic or subject,
includes expert opinions and discussions, and thousands
of code examples and snippets.
Plus, one of the most extensive collections of relevant links.
With these collections, you will be able to get the most
complete picture on any subject or topic and learn the
sophisticated programming techniques from the experts and pros,
discussing any conceivable issue, down to the most intricate
aspects of it.
In many cases, precision and relevance approaches 99%.
The net result: the amount of time, you need to spent
to find the exact information you are looking for,
is reduced to an absolute minimum.
What is there to say? These filters are magic!
Automatically formats the articles to have exactly one blank
line before and after each paragraph and between the
follow-up levels regardless of how badly input article
was formatted. Tabs and code indentation levels are
Each follow-up level is individually styled and colored
to make it very easy to see who is saying what and
Note to article writers:
This is how your articles ought to have been formatted
to begin with.
Expandable article headers
Article headers are not
shown on initial article view. To see them, click
on Headers choice in the article's navigation bar.
Expandable article threads in the article index
Article index displays only one article per thread.
If you see a + sign in front of article subject,
that means there are more article in this thread.
To see all thread articles, click on +.
Note: Threads can not be expanded on
older browsers, such as MSIE 6. In that case,
you need to view the main thread article first,
and from there, navigate with Next and Prev links.
Fixed navigation bar
Article navigation bar stays fixed regardless of
scrolling to make rapid navigation through collection
Precise chapters added
Precise chapters contain the articles,
filtered with even higher accuracy.
In all the Code chapters, this translates into precision approaching 99%.
Chapter names for those chapters end with letter A.
This is probably the best place to start researching some issue.
Major kinds of information are code snippets and examples,
and expert opinions and discussions.
Collections also include lots of relevant links in each chapter.
Get yourself a cup of coffee and make yourself comfy.
The excitement time begins now!
The information is organized according to categories,
called chapters. Each chapter contains the information
on a set of related issues, tools, methods, etc.
There are typically 100 to 1500 articles in each chapter
and hundreds of code snippets and examples.
If some article contains the information on multiple aspects
or issues, it will be included in more than one category.
There are several classes of information:
Code snippets and examples.
The information is filtered with extremely powerful filters
to include only code examples or snippets related to selected
Expert views, opinions and discussions
Contain the articles by authors with above average knowledge
of at least some issues or aspects of the language, techniques, etc.
Expert does not have to be Einstein to be classified
as expert. How detailed and helpful is his presentation,
The more specific and detailed the author's
articles, the more chance he/she may be classified as expert
and his articles are included in the expert chapters.
On the other hand, some people are excluded
from the expert sections for variety of reasons, such as
very poor text formatting, top posting or general sloppiness,
which simply represents the level of their consciousness.
You can not be sloppy in the software business.
The more cryptic you are, the less of a chance you are going
to get into expert sections. Simple as that.
Collections include a large number of relevant links
to the articles on the Internet.
There are different ways to search the collections.
You can search the collections from the search box while viewing some article.
When you enter some search term in the search box,
the chapter to which this article belongs will be searched.
You can even enter some sentence or a phrase and not necessarily
just one or two words.
The search engine also searches for synonyms or similar words.
From the SERP (Search Engine Result Page) you can do other searches by
selecting the collection name and chapter name or specify All choice.
When you perform a search on All chapters/collections,
the SERPS will have duplicate articles. Because the same article
may belong to more than one chapter.
You can search specifying plus sign between the worlds,
meaning the SERPS should contain only articles that have all of the search
You can use quote characters (") around the search term
meaning search for a literal match, meaning the exact phrase.
You can also search the collections via regular search engines.
Make sure to specify the site while doing searches.
If you do not specify the site, then you may not be able
to find most of the articles in Programmer's Goldmine collections.
Google uses filters that could drastically reduce the number
of articles returned by the search if you do not specify
For example, to search for Java Goldmine articles on abstract class,
specify search as:
"abstract class" site:preciseinfo.org
- Google Search by Chapter
You need to specify the full path to some chapter. For example:
"abstract class" site:preciseinfo.org/Convert/Articles_Java/Abstract_Class_Code
The path is specified exactly as seen while viewing some
article in some chapter. Just look at some article
and copy paste the URL between the http://
and the article name (last component of the path)
into your google search box.
You can search the article bodies to find some keywords.
Again, using the browser's internal search.
Depending on a browser you are using, it could be more or less
difficult to do the body searches in the Frame version.
If you intent to do lots of body searches, it is best to use
No Frames version. That will guarantee that the only thing
you are going to be searching is the article bodies and titles.
You can search the article list index to find some keywords
by simply using your internal browser search.
Note: Google takes months to index a large site,
and even after months, it will not include all the articles in
collection. So, if you have a specific issue to resolve, it
is recommended to visit the collection site and navigate
The navigation around collection is very flexible.
It is designed for rapid navigation from any point to any
part of the Collection with minimal screen redraw,
so that you don't loose track of where you are or were
just before viewing any article or scrolling around.
From any article, you can navigate to previous and next article
using Prev and Next links.
You can easily navigate to any chapter or article with a single
mouse click and everything will stay put unlike on most sites you
see on the Internet, where a single mouse click completely redraws
your screen, so you loose focus, and takes you to a completely
different screen without being able to see how it relates to
a previous one and things of that nature.
Note: When you use the Next and Prev links from some
article in the A chapter, you will be automatically
taken to the corresponding thread and can navigate all the
thread articles, even in non A chapter.
To go back to A chapter,
either use the browser's back arrow, or simply click on
a different article in the article index frame.
Using Frames version
From any article, you can review the current chapter's
article list (index) in the article frame. That gives you many
more articles to see in the index.
When you click on Chapter Index or Main Index links,
they will be shown in the article frame while your main
article index still remains visible even if you navigate
to a different chapter in the article frame.
This way, you can do all the work in the article frame.
Note: The article index frame will still hold the original
chapter and you can simply click on any article in it
to continue with the main chapter, even if you switched
chapters from the article frame. Basically, anything you
can imagine in terms of navigation is possible in this design.
You can do all the navigation work staying entirely in
the article frame if you want to.
Nice thing about this arrangement is that you keep accumulating
the browser history, and can always use the browser's Back
and Forward buttons to navigate through your entire session
history and nothing will be lost.
Using No Frames version
With Frames version, everything is shown in a single web browser's
tab window. But there are some minor limitations. The article
subject is not shown in the browser's title bar. The link
to current article is not shown in the browser's URL list.
With No Frames version, everything is displayed in a separate
browser window. The chapter names are shown in one window,
The list of articles in that chapter is shown in a different window.
All the articles are shown in a separate window or tab.
Also, the browser title bar shows the correct article title,
and browser's URL list correctly shows the URL of the article
or chapter you are viewing. Plus, the article window takes the whole
screen space, which is nice, or even necessary, when viewing some
poorly formatted articles.
All the chapters, with names, ending with A,
contain even more precise information, especially in Code chapters.
These chapters were generated using special settings of
our UltraSearch filters, that are orders of magnitude more
precise than anything you have ever seen anywhere.
Next and Prev links are used to navigate through articles
in selected chapter.
If you are reviewing the A chapters, they will take you back to
the corresponding chapter's thread and you will be out of A
chapters. This way, you can review not only high precision articles,
but can also see more articles in the same thread.
To return to A chapters, use your browsers Back arrow,
or select a different article in the A chapter list.
Code chapters contain articles with code snippets
and examples. The chance of finding a code example
in code chapters is over 90%.
Chance of finding a relevant code in CodeA chapters is
Expert chapters contain the articles by experts and pros.
The term expert is used loosely. You don't have to be God
to be classified as expert. But you do have to know what
you are talking about and you are expected to have above
average knowledge of advanced issues.
Precision and/or appropriateness of information to a given
topic, chapter or category of information is one of the most
important system parameters.
Our filtering technology allows searching with nearly infinite precision.
But there is a trade-off between the scope and depth.
There is a fine balance between too many articles that do not
exactly correspond to some issue, and too few articles,
limiting the variety of views, opinions and different ways
of looking at the same thing.
Precision in all the code related chapters is well above 90%.
That is, at least 9 out of 10 articles contain
the information on the topics covered by the chapter.
In comparison to search engines, that are better
classified as garbage generators, where precision is usually
not better than of 1-5%, at best,
these collections are orders of magnitude more precise,
which translates into a much more productive use of
your time, without typical headaches and distractions
associated with navigation through piles of totally irrelevant articles.
With search engines, it is not atypical to see hundreds of
thousands, if not millions of references.
You won't be able to review all that in your entire lifetime,
which simply indicates that you are being fed mostly garbage.
With such an amount of noise, you can hardly stay focused
on the issues at hand. Way too often, the top ranking articles
are filled with blabber from some blog by not very competent
writers or some primitive code examples that virtually
have no realistic application in real life situations.
There isn't even a notion of such a degree of garbage
when you deal with Goldmine collections. Simple as that.
Secondly, it turns out the so called page rank does not assure
quality of information. Some search engines use a number of links
pointing to some article as a major criteria in defining
its "page rank", and, therefore, quality,
which is nothing further from the truth. Their reasoning is
simple: the more people talk about something, the more
"quality" that something has. But is it actually the case?
One thing is certain: the majority opinion never
defines quality, and a larger number of links pointing to some article
does not translate into quality of that article.
By any means.
Just the other way around. In most cases, the higher is the "page rank",
the closer is the article to the top of the search result list,
the higher is the chance it will be filled to the
brim with the largest amount of Google ad spam and all sorts of
most aggressive marketing propaganda, flashing brightly colored
pictures into your face and distracting you from the issues at hand.
As you might have noticed, for some strange reason, many of the
topmost "ranking" articles turn out to be outright junk.
So, the question naturally arises: how come those so called
top ranking articles too often turn out to be some the lowest
quality material if page rank does represent the article quality?
It is probably much more productive if you skip the "top ranking"
articles and start with those on 2nd or 3rd page of search results.
On the top of it, it is a discriminatory system that does not treat
all the authors and their writing fairly
and does not give you a chance to be heard, regardless of quality
of what you have to say.
We would like to emphasize this point really well:
In goldmine collections, there is no such discrimination.
Everyone has equal chance to be heard.
Articles are selected according to totally different set
of criteria. What matters is how well some article corresponds
to the issues covered by some chapter.
The rest is up to reader to decide what
is "good", what is "so so", and what is outright garbage.
After all, who is there to decide for you what is appropriate
to your specific needs, interests or your competence level?
Secondly, at the moment, there exists no technology that is
capable of distinguishing the quality material from anything
else because, first of all, the problem is way too complex
for the machine to be able to do that, and, secondly, the
issue is highly subjective. It all depends on the perceiver,
his competence level, his interests and his personal preferences.
With these discriminatory "ranking systems", that begot
the entire industry of so called SEO (search engine optimization),
some newly written article virtually has no chance to see the
light of day as it may never even get into search engine index,
and even if it does, the chances of it to be near the top of
the list are slim.
The very notion of SEO immediately associates with cheating
somehow, and some of the things related to that "optimization"
border on lunacy.
This so called ranking is not only a calamity.
It is simply appalling. People waste months, if not years,
trying to tweak their sites to get in the "top ranks"
by doing all sorts of craziest things and using all sorts
of tricks, trying to fool the search engines into believing
their articles contain quality material.
In Programmer's Goldmine collections, the principles of article
selection are totally different and have nothing to do with so
called page ranking.
As far as information precision goes, collections also include
the ultimate in precision chapters (with names ending with
Precision of those chapters approaches 99%.
You can hardly find an article that does not
correspond to selected chapter or topic.
If chapter says "Abstract Class Code", you are pretty much
guaranteed to see the code examples on abstract classes,
and plenty of those, in every conceivable permutation.
Again: if we don't have it, it probably does not exist.
As a result, the overall quality of your research experience
is orders of magnitude more satisfying than simply digging
through piles of information, most of which
has little or no relevance to what you are looking for,
and usually contains all sorts of irrelevant blabber from some
blog, written by people with little or no competence,
or some totally inappropriate info,"book stuffing", or all
sorts or marketing propaganda.
The information is regularly updated. The date of the
latest run and article count are shown in the chapter's article list.
The contents will change depending on a particular run
and filter settings. So, do not expect to see the same
articles the next time you look at the collection.
Collections archives go back several years.
Depending on collection, there are typically between 30,000
and 70,000 articles per collection.
Each chapter usually contains between 100 and 1500 articles.
While using collections by reviewing a couple of articles
after doing a search via search engine is the most oftenly
use of these collections, there is even better way to use them,
and that is to become more proficient and learn some things
in a more in-depth manner.
The power and beauty of these collections is their range
of opinions and depth of material.
If you start using these collections as a textbook,
you will learn much more than just looking at couple of
articles after doing a search. Take for example the code
examples chapters. There are typically hundreds of code
examples or snippets in any chapter and explanations of
the problems people are having, just as you would, if you
did not know something well enough.
So, simply reviewing the various code examples, not only
you will learn how to do it, but will also be
able to see how different people do it, what kind of
problems they are having, what kinds of ways they are
proposing to solve it,
their coding style and some other things. So, before you
even start coding something, you can learn the whole thing
in a much more in-depth manner and avoid the types of
problems they are having by simply reviewing their code
and listening to their comments along the way.
But the fine points come in when you study the expert
chapters, which usually takes you to another level.
There may be less code examples, but the coverage of issues
is usually much more in-depth. The discussions of tricks
of the trade are much more sophisticated and typically
include such things as appropriateness of doing something
in a particular way, the best ways of doing it, typical
pitfalls many fall into, and ALL sorts of other very important
principles of top gun programming techniques, style, etc.
So, studying some chapter for a couple of days is probably
equivalent to many days if not months of coding without
much understanding the subtleties and potential pitfalls.
Sure, it all depends on your individual situation.
Quite often, programmers are under pressure to produce
some results. So many tend to be dealing with issues on
a much more superficial level than the task requires.
But just by squeezing an extra few minutes every time
you find some article that seems to be what you are looking for,
and reading a couple more articles in the same chapter,
may be that fine balance between hacking things up
and doing a fine job of writing the clear, correct,
expandable code that would be easy to interface with
If you have some ideas, suggestions, proposals or any other
feedback, you can send an email.
If you find some topics or chapters missing, incomplete,
too big, too small, or containing the low precision information,
do not hesitate to point it out.
All reasonable suggestions are likely to be implemented.
You can participate in this project in several ways.
First, you can provide some feedback and/or ideas.
That is how it starts.
Or you can suggest the filter specifications to either
increase the precision, or include or otherwise polish
If you are an experienced programmer, a web site designer
or a writer, you can participate as a developer or a team member.
And if you are a sponsor or investor, you know what to do.
If you use older browsers, such as MSIE 6, or disable java
script in your browser, certain functionality will not be
available to you. You won't be able to expand the
threads in article list by clicking on + icon.
You will have to click on the main article to view it,
and then use Next and Prev links in the article navigation bar
to navigate on the article thread level.
Also, navigation bar will not stay fixed when you scroll the
Install more modern browser, such as Firefox or Opera.
There is really no reason to use MSIE 6 at this point.
It is utterly obsoleted by now and quite a few things
do not work on modern sites.
This is a goldmine, not a bank.
You can not just walk in and expect a gold nugget handed to you
on a silver plate. You have to do your part also.
But it is there, waiting to be discovered.
There are some very unpleasant news related to searches
done via Google.
As was accidentally discovered, if you perform a search,
you may not find some articles that actually exist in Google's index.
In some instances, the SERPs (Search Engine Results Pages)
may give you much lower number of articles than actually
exist in Google index. How it may affect some searches,
is difficult to predict.
In this context, depending on what you are trying to find,
you might want to visit the site directly, instead of
relying on search engine.
Another alternative is to search a specific chapter
instead of searching the entire collection.
In this case, you need to specify a full path to
a specific chapter you are interested in.
For example, if you are looking
for articles on abstract class,
you can specify your search as:
"abstract class" site:preciseinfo.org/Convert/Articles_MFC/Abstract_Class_Code
Notice the underline characters in the chapter name.
Chapter subdirectories use the underline characters instead of blanks.
Just look at any article URL in the web browser URL field
to see the full path for some article. Or if you are not currently
viewing some chapter article, copy/paste the chapter name from
chapter list to browser URL field and replace blanks with
The chapter search will find you the largest number of articles in any
chapter. If you do a search without specifying the chapter subdirectory,
you may not see all the articles that actually exist for a given search.
There seems to be something new happening on Google.
But since Google keeps its secrets even better than CIA,
all you are likely to hear about it is rumors.
The index for Goldmine collections started decreasing
steadily starting in early May 2009, and finally dropped
by as much as whooping 1000 times.
At high point,
there was somewhere between 20,000 to 50,000 articles
indexed per collection. At the lowest point, which is now,
some sites show as little as 300 articles indexed out
of about 65,000 that do exist in Google index.
This happens when you do a site:... type of search
without specifying a specific chapter path.
This is obviously wrong,
because for many chapters, a single chapter has more
articles indexed than you see on SERP for the entire collection.
How is this possible under ANY circumstances?
As to why, you can only guess.
Trying to resolve this issue on Google Webmaster forums
produced nothing but hostility, insults and harassment.
All the "Top Contributors" could care less what
you might think or experience as a result
Interestingly enough, while google index
dropped by about 40 times on average, the actual page view
count dropped by only 3 times, which indicates that plenty
of users have Goldmine collections bookmarked and do not
necessarily even do Google searches.
In some cases, the SERPs estimated number of articles
differs from correct number of articles that do exist in
index by nearly 1000 times, which is simply astounding
if you think of it.
The CORRECT result for search on "mfcgoldmine.uuuq.com"
Results 1 - 10 of about 1,030,000 for "mfcgoldmine.uuuq.com".
The INCORRECT result is:
Results 1 - 10 of about 3,700 for "mfcgoldmine.uuuq.com".
Snapshot of CORRECT result is:
That is whooping 278 times off. Why do these things happen,
we can only guess.
This issue was brought up on Google Webmaster forums,
but results were simply shocking.
All of the most qualified individuals, or "Top Contributors",
as they call them, flatly denied that such
a thing is possible even after some hard evidence
was presented. Apparently, you can not even start
questioning the correctness of search results.
Nobody is going to listen.
You will be viewed as a fool and will be ridiculed,
insulted and harassed. Questioning anything related
to Google is a taboo.
In some cases, the behavior of these "top contributors"
was simply outrageous in its arrogance and
total absence of willingness to even hear anything that
does not align with the Google Doctrine, which is
Google is ALWAYS right, and you are always wrong.
Some of them simply stated flatly:
Believe me - Google is NOT going to change ANYTHING to please you.
To PLEASE you? Even after hard evidence was
presented in form of screen-shots, it just flew by their ears.
They kept flatly denying every single bit of it and kept
fabricating some "explanations" that mostly border on utter
lunacy and total incompetence.
Talking to them is like talking to a wall. Simply unreal in its
arrogance. You can see some of that puppet show on following
"Google index drops like a rock"
(deleted by "Top Contributor" Phil Payne) and
show. (the latter one is still alive for some strange reason)
The bottom line is:
If you are too damn stupid to accept all of that ...
I'll * well delete/report! ... Am I Clear?
-- Autocrat, one of "Top Contributors" on Google webmaster forums.
Well, if THESE kinds of threats are
their "argument", then what kind of answer or explanation
can you possibly expect?
Most of what they had to say had absolutely nothing to do
with the exact issues being discussed, and it is understandable
since they are not professionals, having necessary
educational background to comprehend the search engine
mechanics. So they just kept coming up with new insults
trying to discredit even the hardest evidence there is.
Someone, who also had some issue to resolve and ended
up being harassed, insulted and ridiculed, said:
"looks like 1984 came alive" and surely it looked like it.
Finally, once the harassments and insults have reached
their peak and they got enough satisfaction from all that
sadomasochistic feeding frenzy, the threads, related
to these issues just started disappearing, like they never
existed. For no reasons at all. It all looked like some
bizarre movie from some fantasy land.
It was just about the most blatant form of destruction
of evidence imaginable.
Eventually, one "Top Contributor", Phil Payne,
admitted he did remove those articles. When asked why
did he do so, he stated:
But it was me, because valuable volunteer time
was being taken up to no useful purpose.
And my fingers are itching again."
What a grand farce!
Do these people think no one has functioning brains to
see through it? Is it some kind of a bad joke?
As a result, several threads with important information and
hard evidence simply disappeared from Google Webmaster forums,
at least as they thought.
The bottom line is google search results can not be trusted
as they are totally inconsistent and net effects of some of
it could hardly be estimated without conducting a detailed
"One picture is worth a thousand words".
This picture was posted as an answer
by "Top Contributor" webado
thread in Google Webmaster forums. That was the
"answer". Besides this
picture, there wasn't a single word
said in that response.
Indeed, it pretty much covers the issue of how much Google
cares about whatever anybody has to say or issues
they bring up.
Interestingly enough, every single "Top Contributor",
participating in that thread, responded "Yes" to
the question "Do you think this answers the question?"
EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM!
The bottom line is: Google is ALWAYS right and users
are ALWAYS wrong."
Mind you, these people have the authority to remove ANY thread,
for any reason whatsoever, and they use this power more often
than not, regardless of who is "right" and who is "wrong".
On the top of it, there is a clear conflict of interest.
All of these people are "SEOs" and they are not paid by
Google, at least according to their own statements on record.
It is all classified as "volunteer" activity, which immediately
flashes some red lights, especially in the context of the fact
that they seem to spend nearly all of their time on these
To even begin to comprehend such a degree of dedication
to "free service", especially in the context of trying to "help"
the biggest and the fattest name in the industry, is simply mind
boggling, which immediately brings up this question:
why would anyone in his clear mind spend all of his time
doing this so called volunteer work? There simply MUST be some
benefits, and there are some, definitely.
These people are continuously spamming
the webmaster forums with mostly quite irrelevant
and most useless posts. Most of their recommendations
do not improve anything. They behave like bullies and
pose as some kind of experts that really know something of value,
where in fact most of it is just bluff and self promotion.
Their style of presentations is simply offensive, insulting,
harassing and even threatening, at least as this
particular case shows in no uncertain terms.
And probably the most amazing thing in all this
is the fact that when they harass someone or even remove
their entire thread, they do it in the name of keeping
the "positive user friendly experience for everyone"
slogan. That IS quite an achievement indeed. In perversion
This so called volunteer work is in fact their main business,
and it vitally depends on users to be "wrong" somewhere,
so they could be "helped" with their "services".
Otherwise, if some webmaster does not admit he is wrong, he is virtually useless.
He is nothing more than trouble. The best way to hanlde these kinds of people
is to immediately suppress their input and chase them away,
so nobody could ever learn the truth of the matter and start questioning
any of their so called advices or the way Google does what it does.
It is like a factory. The quicker you
get "processed", the better. According to the
observed speed with which they "process" people, it looks
like a well functioning operation. Humming like Bentley.
Only Nazi concentration camps worked "more efficiently"
It was quite revealing to see these kinds of remarks:
"But it was me [who deleted the entire thread],
because valuable volunteer time was being taken up to no
-- Phil Payne, Top Contributor
"Valuable volunteer time"?
Well, but how come Google does not pay a penny for it,
if it is so valuable?
And who ARE you to decide for Google what is and what is not
an issue on Google webmaster forums and what is the most appropriate
way to handle it?
He just forgot to mention "and we are getting nowhere in terms
of getting some business from you". But you don't usually say
these things aloud. They need to be understood on subconscious
level, via environment you create. Fancy stuff in mind manipulation
You see, discussing the wildest imaginable
discrepancies in SERPs and providing the hardest evidence
possible, apparently serves no useful purpose...
Might be enlightening to learn what kind of things
do serve a "useful purpose" in their opinion?
Or you might hear something like "no matter what you think or do,
it won't impact Google in ANY way, shape or form. You'll see..."
Looks like quite a "positive user experience for everyone".
No questions about it.
So, if someone brings up some issue that does not fit this
scheme, the first thing that happens is to make a fool out
of him. Then he is insulted, ridiculed, laughed at, abused,
harassed and provoked, so he starts defending his position,
and the more he is trying to defend himself, the deeper he gets,
and the more he gets insulted, harassed, ridiculed, lied to,
or some totally ungrounded concoctions are fabricated, trying
to discredit him in the shortest possible time, like it is
some kind of competition.
And these "volunteers" come in packs.
To make their work more effective, several of them start
attacking the victim simultaneously, so he gets dazzled
and shocked by all sorts of totally of the wall things they
One of the tricks used is hijacking threads with totally off-topic
insulting remarks in order to quickly overwhelm the victim
and delude the original information, so the whole thread
looks like a grand pile of garbage and insults, no one
in his clear mind would be interested in reading or following.
This is a standard trick used by the power hungry "rulers"
in all sorts of places on the net. This is how these sadists
destroy the overall integrity of the material.
Another trick, oftenly used by these kinds of people,
is concocting some horror stories out of thin air,
and plenty of people get caught into the nets
they weave, these servants of the dark side.
It is basically a guilt manipulation trick to constrict
one's energy and get it all entangled in all the futile
efforts of self-defense, while these virtual parasites
suck his energy.
Would be interesting to know how do they divide their "zones".
Which one gets the client? According to what system or
hierarchy? Well, there IS in fact a hierarchy in this shark
tank, starting from "level 1", meaning a "newbie" or "clueless",
going up to "level 4", and then... Tada, "Top Contributor",
"Bionic Poster"! Is this some kind of a Matrix scheme?
Who are these "bionic posters"? Are they from the planet Earth?
And Google could care less about any of this.
Because it is not them doing all these things.
Therefore, no responsibility, no accountability, nothing.
Just pure pleasure, and all for free!
It is just some "isolated individual", who has no association
to Google in any way, shape or form, except of these quite
reasonable abilities to virtually do anything he pleases,
going as far, as destroying all the evidence
of this sick orgy by removing those threads, so there is no
trace of it left anywhere.
Why would Google allow such an ugly, if not outrageous
puppet theatre in the name of webmaster help forums?
Don't they realize this is simply inevitable in this kind
Is this how they buy this "volunteer work" so they don't have
to spend an extra penny on hiring the professionals to do
this work on the proper level and in the appropriate environment?
And, on the top of it, manage to keep their hands clean,
like it is not them, doing all this ugly stuff?
Looks like quite an interesting arrangement,
if you think about it.
In this kind of setting, any potential issues of problems
on the Google's end are conveniently destroyed and suppressed,
especially considering this quite unusual power of ability
to even remove the threads, given to totally unauthorized personnel.
Would be enlightening to learn whose idea it was and what is
the very purpose if it.
Looks like quite a scheme in perversion. To even conceive
an idea of using someone else's hands to do the dirty work of
destroying any evidence of any kinds of problems on your end
for you and then, if it ever comes up again, claiming you have
nothing to do with any of this as it was not done by the
Takes quite some some criminal mind to even conceive such
an ugly perversion and such a cunning and outright appalling
scheme. Simply unbelievable in its utter cunningness
and utter absence of any kind of notion of honesty and
Not only that, but it is all done for you for FREE!
What kind of mind does it take to even conceive something like this?
Anybody has a clue?
Just look at this circus. It is all on record by now.
Not a single one of these individuals has the necessary
technical background to deal with the issues discussed
on any of these threads, and yet, all of them
literally overwhelm you with their totally off the wall,
and utterly unauthorized opinions and flat denials of
the hardest evidence there is, without having the
necessary competence to understand ANY of it.
They simply jam it down your throat, and if you refuse
to eat some of that garbage, you might hear something like:
If you are too damn stupid to accept all of that ...
I'll * well delete/report! ... Am I Clear?
-- Autocrat, one of "Top Contributors" on Google webmaster forums.
How many of these people do have a sufficient competence in
these issues and do understand the search engine mechanics
and internals? Well, not a single one of them! OBVIOUSLY.
Otherwise, they would not be doing this "volunteer" work,
but would work for Google or some other company, making
more money than most of them can even imagine, instead
of wasting away doing all this "volunteer service", which
in reality is the last thing they care for to begin with.
Secondly, since Google does not disclose any of important
information as to the workings of its search engine, ALL
they are talking about on these forums is rumors, and
nothing but rumors, based on very few useful bits and
pieces of information Google already publishes in various places.
Or does Google hold the special educational seminars to train
its "volunteers" as to the search engine operation?
Then why did not Google simply publish all this
information so that everyone could see it and be equally
Why do we have this grand confusion bordering
on outright disinformation on the global scale and all
these totally unsubstantiated rumors,
being peddled all day long?
Is it some kind of elitist club where only the chosen
few get the "inside" information on the workings of Google
search engine and associated procedures, rules and "regulations"?
Some of the suggestions these
people provide left and right are CLEARLY irrelevant as
has been observed on the working sites. Many, if not
most of their suggestions to improve things, do not
actually produce ANY benefits whatsoever. None.
On the top of it, WHO are these people and what is their
purpose of being on these forums?
Are they the living manifestations of Jesus Christ entity,
and is their purpose here to "save the world"?
Or to help the biggest and the baddest monopolist on the
face of the planet Earth, who got carried away with his
imaginary unlimited "powers" to the point of beyond obscene?
Yes, one thing they do seem to know for sure, and that is how to
quickly destroy as many people as possible, so this
seemingly smoothly working slaughter machine could move on to its
next victim, unless of course that one is going to admit that he
simply MUST be "wrong" somewhere, and asks for their assistance
via conveniently provided web page or some other contact
information, and THAT is what seems to be their REAL reward in this
puppet theatre of "positive user experience for everyone",
which, for some strange reason, turns out to be nothing more
than a giant slaughter machine.
So, if someone refuses to submit to their agenda,
and does not admit he is "wrong" somewhere,
he would have to go through the whole works, and,
eventually, when these sadists had enough fun torturing
him, they unceremoniously remove his threads
to cover up the tracks of that ugly sadistic orgy.
On the top of that, they may even send you some additional insults
via email with a thread removal message, to add the insult to injury,
just as was the case with these threads in more than
Simple as that.
What a beauty of a scheme.
Who could even conceive such a brilliant piece of most blatant
and even brutal system of exploitation of everything that moves,
and does not, for that matter?
This fact alone is simply outrageous as far as Google motives
are concerned. If the sole GLOBAL information monopolist
is so greedy to even afford to hire a few professionals
to provide a qualified help, and instead, creates this
puppet theatre ran by all these "volunteers", who,
nevertheless, for some strange reason have the authorities,
broad enough to even remove the entire threads,
regardless of whether it is appropriate
or not, then what kind of motivation that biggest,
baddest and the fattest monopolist might have?
Another interesting legal loophole in this kind of arrangement
is the fact that doing business this way, Google virtually
avoids any responsibility for any action by these individuals.
Most likely, there isn't even a written contract between the
parties, so Google is likely to claim "well, it was not the
official and authorized position of Google", etc.
So, no responsibility, no accountability, no associated expenses,
and this virtual slaughter chamber is humming along just
perfectly, destroying any and all unfavorable opinions, views
or potential issues. Never mind those "collateral damages" here and there,
and if you look at it closer, basically everywhere you look.
But there is one little twist on this matter.
Apparently Goolde does implicitly authorise these individuals
to do what they do by creating a special "top contributors" page
where it lists all these people and higly recommends them as
"valuable contributors". Therefore, whatever statements these
people make are made on behalf of Google and all their activity
including these ugly orgies, insults, harassment and defamation
are in fact done with full authorization of Google, especially
in the light of fact that Google employees have never even placed
any of these individuals on notice after seeing these ugly orgies.
Interesting arrangement. Google gives them a chance to do anything
they please on these forums, including doing any kind of marketing
they want to promote their business, and going up to removal of
any thread they want. They can insult anyone in any way they see
fit, and won't even get a notice from Google employees for doing so.
And in return, they help to keep the perfect image of Google
by harassing, insulting, ridiculing and making a fool out of
anyone, who is questioning anything as far as Google goes.
What a perfect way "to do business"! Even Mafia and drug
dealers would probably feel jealous. Because even there, there
is at least some responsibility, at least some expenses.
But here? Hey, virtual paradise... In other words, a pure
disgrace to the whole concept of business as such.
The net result? Well, the chances of you ever hearing
about any kind of problems on the Google's end of the wire,
are as slim as it gets.
Ever heard of The Google Doctrine?
Google is ALWAYS right and users
are ALWAYS wrong."
Simple as that, and that IS
the reality of this global monstrosity.
If you are too damn stupid to accept all of that ...
I'll * well delete/report! ... Am I Clear?
-- Autocrat, one of "Top Contributors" on Google webmaster forums.
This picture is probably the best graphical representation
of the way Google handles web master support issues.
When you see it showing up on some thread, you know you are
in the right place and help is forthcoming indeed.
This happens to be one of "Top Contributors" on Google webmaster
forums, who goes by the nick Autocrat.
If you keep this picture in mind when you
visit this forum, that might help you to keep things in
proper perspective. Otherwise, you might think you entered
some insane asylum.
Its been a long time due for the mankind to wake up and realize
what kind of garbage and all sorts of most blatant forms of
consumerism and marketing propaganda his mind is being
constantly zombified with, to the point of oblivion.
Sooner or later, we are bound to realize what is
being done with human mind, morning to night, and what kind
of garbage it is being fed any place you look.
Unless those chests with Google secrets are opened up for
everyone to see, just as Microsoft was forced to do with
its operating systems and other software, we simply have
no chance to control or affect our destiny. It will be
controlled by some force of most profound evil, the same
evil that brought the planet Earth to the miserable state
it is in.
If we continue to allow this secrecy, affecting the entire world, to go on,
we simply have no chance to see the light at the end of a tunnel we are in.
In today's information intensive world, anything hardly ever
happens without participation of Google search
engine, and what comes as top items can be easily manipulated
in any way conceivable via various adjustments to so called page
ranks, so the lowest grade garbage in terms of information quality
appears as the cream of the crop material in the topmost positions
on Google SERPs.
The abilities of such a horrendous system of manipulation
and molding of the human minds are simply unheard of in the
entire history of mankind. Its ability to sculpt and
manufacture just about ANY kind of personality via constant
and unending zombification by presenting desired types of
information in the top positions on SERPs is simply
"Any lie, repeated long enough, eventually becomes truth"
-- Adolph Hitler
So, by simply presenting you the same thing again and again and again,
even the lowest grade garbage becomes about the only thing there is.
Because that is the only thing you see and that is the only thing
you know. Simple as that.
After all, how many SERPs do you usually go through,
and which articles do you click on?
Well, in vast majority of cases, you never go past the
page number three in search results, and the closer to
the top of the first page some result is, the higher is the
chance you are going to click on it, and it is approaching
this theoretical limit of 100% certainty in geometric
progression as related to its position in the SERPs.
And the only one who knows how it all works and who
pulls what strings is Google, and they pretend they
are just like any other business, "trying to make a buck".
But in reality, depending on how things get promoted to
the top of the heap, the entire mankind's destiny is being
decided, and with each and every one of your heart beats.
Everyone is running around propagating some rumors.
But no one really knows according to what principles certain
information appears in top positions in the Google search
results. Because it is all "secret", or rather hidden.
So, by simply manipulating the information and promoting
certain types of information into top positions,
it is possible mould the human minds in any way conceivable.
How come, to this day, with all its resources, Google
did not create some clearly written guidelines, outlining
the "rules of the game", point by point, so that everyone
knows how it works and everyone is in equal position?
What we have instead is some vague and pretty useless
bits of information, most of which is of abstract nature,
not stating anything in specifics, sufficient enough to
make an intelligent decision.
The grip of this global information monopoly
on the issues of modern world are hard to even begin to
Because at this junction, Google basically has a blank
check to do as they please and no one even knows what
is hidden in that Google chest of secrets, conveniently
labeled "Proprietary Information".
At the same time, for all practical purposes, Google
is running the world, and its impact is simply immense
from any angle you can look at it.
Its effects are most profound and will ripple through
the generations to come, and we can only hope, that
if it this chest is ever opened, we are not going to
fall on our rears in utter disgust, and holler, in
utter despair "oh my God!"
How do you know who is really running the world
behind the scenes and according to what principles?
Do you even care to know? Or all you are
interested in, is your own pay check? If so, get ready for
something forthcoming, that will not only boggle your mind,
but will make you the walking zombies, not even having
enough will power to commit suicide in the unending
misery of cataclysmic events.
Isn't it the time to think about these kinds of things?
Some completely unexplainable behavior of Google search
engine has been discovered recently, and the more analysis
was performed, the more it looked like manual manipulation
of SERPs (Search Engine Result Pages). Following are some
Disappearance of "Top search queries" entries from SERPs
Google provides various tools for webmasters to
see various aspects of performance of their sites.
One of them, called "Top search queries", shows
the best performing search queries and their relative
position on Google SERPs. Those queries were indeed performed,
and if you perform the same searches again, you should see your
site appearing in approximately the same position on one of SERPs,
as it appears on "Top search queries" page.
What has been discovered with Programmer's Goldmine
collections, is that if you perform the same queries
again, you won't find your site on ANY of
the resulting SERPs for most of the same queries Google
reports as your "Top search queries". Not in the same position,
not in a lower or higher position. You simply won't find
them on ANY SERP.
Such a behavior is not possible in a normally functioning
system without manual manipulation of search engine rules
or filters. Any query may only get into lower position on
SERPs, but not disappear altogether.
Otherwise, it is a ticket to global disaster.
If you can make some kinds of information simply disappear
and other types of information appear in the top positions,
then what would it eventually and inevitably lead to?
Here is some screen shots of existing queries:
Furthermore, if you look at the same "Top search queries"
page right now, you will notice that most of the queries
no longer exist. Out of a maximum 100 queries,
only 18 are left.
Similar results were observed for other PG sites.
If you look at the same "Top search queries" page right now,
most of the queries simply evaporated. They no longer exist at all.
Not in lower position, not in higher position, not in ANY position.
Furthermore, out of the a maximum of 100 queries, only 32 remain.
But where did all others go?
Dramatic and totally unexplainable jumps in number of pages indexed
It has been observed, that starting from early May, 2009,
the number of pages indexed by Google from Programmer's Goldmine
sites started to decrease steadily and quite drastically.
At this point, some sites show hundreds of times fewer articles
indexed, compared to what they had before this unexplainable drop.
Google recommends webmasters use the site:yoursite.yourdomain
to determine the number of pages indexed. Obviously, when your
index starts dropping like a rock, there is something wrong
somewhere, especially in the light of the fact that there was
no changes to the sites. All the attempts to figure out what could possibly
be the reason for such an unusual and rapid drop lead nowhere.
Then, all of a sudden, while doing a daily check on a number
of pages indexed, it has been observed that the number jumped
to a much higher value, hundreds of times bigger than it
would show most of the time. Interestingly enough, that higher number
did correspond to an estimated number of pages that should
have been indexed. That was actually the correct number, seen
before these drastic drops in counts of pages indexed.
When this issue was brought up on Google webmaster forums,
the result was utter hostility and flat denial of undeniable.
Some of the "explanations" and "reasons" for such a drop
simply bordered on utter lunacy as they had absolutely nothing
to do with this kind of behavior
Even after presenting a hard evidence in form of screen-shots,
it was all either totally ignored, denied or discounted as
something "normal". The explanation was "well, it is just an
estimate". Well, fine. Obviously, the estimates can not possibly
be exact. But when those estimates are hundreds and thousands
times off, then what kind of estimates are they? What DO they
estimate, if anything, even remotely resembling any kind of reality?
Interestingly enough, it has been noticed that in most cases,
you would see a much lower number of pages indexed, but once
in a while, it would jump hundreds of times higher.
The most interesting thing about it is that these results
would not simply vary in some unpredictable manner, but would
jump around those relatively stable lower and higher numbers
in a very consistent manner.
Such a behavior is simply impossible in a normally functioning
system. It is possible in two cases only:
a) the system is profoundly broken and results are totally inconsistent.
b) the system is manipulated to produce these lower numbers
artificially under certain conditions, for whatever reasons.
Here is some specific examples and evidence in form of screen shots.
This is what search shows most of the times:
3,790 for mfcgoldmine.uuuq.com
while the correct number is:
1,030,000 for mfcgoldmine.uuuq.com
That is whooping 271 times off!
How could ANY kind of estimate be so much off,
it they are to mean anything, even remotely resembling reality?
Screenshot for the correct index:
Note: this is how Google recommends to find out the number
of pages indexed from your site.
61,800 from mfcgoldmine.uuuq.com - correct result
1,160 from mfcgoldmine.uuuq.com - incorrect result
That is 53 times off!
37,900 from mfcgoldmine.by.ru - correct result
1,490 from mfcgoldmine.by.ru - incorrect result
That is 25 times off!
826,000 for mfcgoldmine.by.ru - correct result
4,460 for mfcgoldmine.by.ru - incorrect result
That is 185 times off!
32,800 from cppgoldmine.uuuq.com - correct result
2,880 from cppgoldmine.uuuq.com - incorrect result
That is 11 times off!
543,000 for cppgoldmine.uuuq.com - correct result
4,320 for cppgoldmine.uuuq.com - incorrect result
That is 125 times off!
25,400 from cppgoldmine.by.ru - correct result
315 from cppgoldmine.by.ru - incorrect result
That is 80 times off!
513,000 for cppgoldmine.by.ru - correct result
3,060 for cppgoldmine.by.ru - incorrect result
That is 167 times off!
10,400 from javagoldmine.uuuq.com - correct result
3,190 - incorrect result
459,000 for javagoldmine.uuuq.com - correct result
6,200 for javagoldmine.uuuq.com - incorrect result
That is 74 times off!
71,200 from tarkus01.by.ru - correct result
15,400 from tarkus01.by.ru - incorrect result
What is interesting about this behavior is that it is pretty
much the same regardless of which site we are looking at
or which country is it located in.
It is hard to even imagine what kind of an impact these
kinds of discrepancies may have on all sorts of sites
and net as a whole.
Drastic reduction of article page views on PG sites
After publication of a reference to the article you are reading
on Google webmaster forums and its subsequent view by the Google
personnel from various Google offices worldwide, traffic dropped
significantly. This is not a normal behavior and is a clear
evidence of manual manipulations, atypical of normal operation of
the search engine.
There were no changes to any of these sites recently.
So, the entire set of events does not make any logical sense whatsoever.
On the top of it, these are some of the cleanest sites on the net.
As far as new Google's slogan of "positive user experience" goes,
these are the absolute cream of the crop sites.
Because there is not a single ad on any of these sites.
That slogan has to do with a number of ads on some web page
as a percentage of useful information on that page.
The amount of useful information in each article is 100%,
unlike most of the sites on the net, where you get up to 95%
of ads per page, and in some instances even worse than that.
Furthermore, these collections are unique as they contain the
precisely selected information going back several years,
organized in the most intuitively natural way, just like any
book, and article format is probably the best among
the comparable collections.
Not even major players, such as Google itself and others,
have articles formatted in such a clean and clear way.
As to overall quality of article selection, you can not
possibly achieve such an outstanding performance even if
you use the Google itself. Not a single major player has
such an outstanding collection of articles so precisely
selected and organized as well as Programmer's Goldmine
So, what does this slogan of "positive user experience"
mean in effect?
These collections contain hundreds of thousands of
practical program examples and expert discussions on
every conceivable topic, precisely selected from
millions of articles. There is just nothing like it
on the entire net. Simple as that.
In summary, among all the similar
collections on the net, these are the cream of the crop.
They are viewed by the leading software and hardware manufacturers
and pro software engineers from all over the world, and,
at this point, they are the recommended reference material at several
educational institutions and research organizations worldwide.
Some of the leading companies in the world regularly use these
collections on a daily basis.
You can review the threads from Google webmaster forums to get
more specific details, screen shots, logs and other evidence
to see for yourself what is it that we are dealing with here.
Most of these threads were deleted from Google webmaster
forums for utterly erroneous reasons.
After visiting the Google webmaster forums recently to see what's new
under the Sun, and noticing the regular harassment orgy, typical of Google
webmaster forums, a question was asked of one of these so called
"top contributors". What is your interest in all this?
His response was his typical concoction of lies and fabrications, based in fiction,
perverting things to the level of obscene.
What followed, was quite interesting to observe.
He was reminded, for the umptieth time, that he has no authority,
whatsoever, to make any representations on behalf of Google as to
internals and principles of search engine operation, the DC (DataCenter)
updates, filters, Google regularly applies to censor the content on the
Internet and things of that nature.
Within minuets that message was removed by Google.
That was between strange and unreal.
Yes, some specific quotes of his simply outrageous harassments
were presented and some hard facts related to his lies, fabrications
and concoctions of a sick mind were presented indeed, and what does
he expect when he does what he does?
But to remove a response to some totally berserk set of lies was
something else. No questions about it.
First of all, that response was simply clearly addressing his
concoctions point by point and reminding him of his real authority,
which is none, zero, zip, zilch. These nobodies, called "top contributors",
give all sorts of utterly useless advices to the clueless webmasters
and keep fabricating the issues and all sorts of horror stories out of thin air
all the time on those forums, and not a single one of them really knows
what he is talking about because whatever information Google decides to release, it already
does. Period. Full stop. Bas!
Google SPECIFIALLY withholds all sorts of most important information, vital
to any webmaster and site owner, who wants to run a successful business,
which is one of the biggest problems with Google and which poses one
of the most profound threats not only to some regular business, but
to the mankind as such, as its entire future vitally depends on this
humongous monopoly, operated based on principles of the most profound
evil, and there is so much evidence of it all over the place, it is
simply hard to comprehend why, to this very moment, the international
community did not place limits on its all pervasive influence in almost
any area conceivable.
If Google can go as far as to put no one less than one of the biggest
and most respectable brands under the Sun, BMW, on its knees, and force
them to totally change their entire model just because Google refuses to
accept their normal and quite usual ways of doing business, typical of
automotive and other similar industries, then you can not even begin to
comprehend the consequences of such a blatant domination of such profound
Automotive industry has some very specific properties.
For one thing, their inventories run into millions of parts.
All these parts are the same for any of their franchises.
All of them are selling the same parts and services.
But, according to Google, you can not have a so called duplicate
content, which means?
Well, which means that every single shop has to have a different
web page for a different part or a set of related parts. Otherwise,
they are not going to show up in Google search as a separate entity.
Because such content already exists elsewhere on the net, and primarily
on BMW sites. So, what does one have to do to run his business if he
wants to stay in business and to be able to advertise his operation
Does anyone comprehend the consequences of Google dictating things
of THIS caliber to the whole world? Or do you, in your clear mind,
think this is some kind of exception?
But what about airline reservation systems?
Can those advertise as separate agencies and have the same information
as available on a parent site?
What about just about ANY kind of business out there?
How would the dentists create a "unique and compelling" content
out of the same set of parts, tools, medications, methods and you
name it, without being threatened by this global monstrosity
And this is just a TIP of an iceberg. Go visit the Google webmaster
forums. You won't believe your eyes how many people are crying like
babies, begging on their knees, being humiliated and insulted by these
monsters with criminal minds, who blatantly put "Kiss My Wookie"
on their favicons and name themselves Autocrat?
And if you decide to speak up and bring the most unprecedented kinds
of errors and problems on a Google's end or address this giant slaughter
machine, called webmaster forums, then not only your articles and the
entire threads get removed, but your account is blocked?
For WHAT? For telling the TRUTH? Just like it is?
And not only your account is blocked, but from then on, you
as indivitual are banned forever and prevented from even having
an opportunity to present your position and address the issues
of the most unprecedented discrepancies and errors in Google
search engine operation conceivable?
What kind of "opaque business model" is this?
A model of Raging Hell?
By ANY chance?
And these monsters with criminal minds, harassing people all day long
on Google webmaster forums just keep raging on, without even being
placed on notice?
Based on what monkey logic?
And Google thinks there is no limits to its "power" of most profound evil?
Destroying millions of livelihoods because of its utter idiocy in this
cunning architecture based on the opinions of the herd, like it was a
word of God?
Does ANYONE has ANY specific objections?
On ANY specific issues?
Let me see that!
Planet Earth, Planet Earth. ANYBODY HOME?
It would seem to be MUCH more appropriate for Google to publish
the exact information, point by point, on all the
potential issues Google might have with some site as related to various
practices people use, hopelessly trying to improve their "ratings".
And those ratings, to begin with, is about the biggest calamity on the net.
Because of the fundamentally wrong architecture of Google search engine,
that is based primarily on this fictitious concept of backlinks, instead of
focusing on technologies and methods that allow one to find the information
based on the content itself and not on a number of links pointing to some
bizarre article, the font size of your h1 header, or the alt text you
place on your images?
Fine. So what kind of things you are likely to find with this kind of technology?
Some utterly incompetent blabber, written by some clueless kids, wasting away on the net
and shouting kill, kill, kill all day long?
It has been stated before, and let us repeat it again, and again, and again:
Majority opinion NEVER, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES defines quality.
And that is exactly what Google does. It defines the quality and informational
value based on how many links point to some web page.
And that is Google's ace card. That is what Google in actuality is.
The number of links pointing to some site. All other bells and whistles
simply attempt to get this crooked man walk straight, which is impossible
What you have as a result is the so called ranking system.
The more fools talk about something, the more "value" that something
must have according to this monkey logic of oblivion and total zombification
So, what kind of things appear in the TOP positions in the SERPs
(Search Engine Result Pages) as a result of all this lunacy?
Well, you can bet your you know what that most of it will be some blog,
where all sorts of kids with well below average level of competence
talk about something that happens to be a subject of what you are looking
for. Except you are likely to be looking for some quality material,
and instead, you get the idle chatter by the clueless, filling the top slots
in the search result page.
What are the chances of you finding some brilliant writer,
who has brilliant ideas or revolutionary discovery, not yet known
to the world? Guess!
The chances are zero, zip and zilch.
Why? Well, because nobody knows him yet. He has no back links.
How would he get those links to even get into 1000th position on SERPs?
Go around the world to all sorts of places and spam them out of their
head, just like Google does ALL over the net?
Is THAT the solution to the worlds problems at the moment?
And that IS the "bottom line" of all this.
And THAT is what you get as a result of this totally broken concept
and this obscene idea of backlinks, having absolutely nothing to do
with any kind of quality or informational value.
Then, as a result, people start trying to cheat the system by stuffing
links, preloading all sorts of garbage keywords wherever they can find
a place to stick them on, putting tens of copies of the same keywords
as alt text to images, like it means something, and on and on and on.
Just go visit the Google webmaster forums. That is what they are
dealing with over there all day long, every single day of the year.
All sorts of people come there all the time and most of them are
doing the same stoopid things trying to cheat nothing less than
the Monster Google itself! To cheat nothing less than the servant
of the most profound evil manifest? You must be outa your mind!
Now, what if you have a picture of an act of ejaculation
and load the alt text with something like "the latest scientific
discovery of thermonuclear synthesis"? Do you, in your clear mind,
think that Google is capable of determining that your text has
ABSOLUTELY nothing to do with that picture? How would they do so?
What if you make your h1 headers of 240 point size?
What about it?
Do you realize how many stoopid tricks are there people are trying
for years, hoping to get into "top ranks", "da elite" level?
And what do you think Google does meanwhile?
Well, they have armies of bio-robots, called programmers, running
up and down the hallways with plastic smiles on their dumb, sucky
input holes, with their hairs raised, thinking how to counteract
all the tricks you keep forever inventing to "beat da system".
THIS is what is happening as a result. A tremendous waste, based
on the principles of utmost cunningness and deceit, hoping against
all hope "to beat da system". What a waste of human potential!
And when someone brings these issues up, you destroy what they have
to say and you even try to destroy them as individuals?
What kind of model is this?
Well, a model of raging hell it is.
Now, how many generations does the mankind have a chance to survive
for with this kind of model of solving the most urgent problems
facing the entire planet Earth and your own lives and lives of
your own children, and children of your children, if you are lucky
to make it for the next two generations. Because what is forthcoming
will not only boggle your minds, but will make walking zombies
out of most of you, not even having enough will power to commit
suicide, my dear humanity.
And this is just one miniscule example of the most profound ways
that monster machine, called Google, based on pure bluff, affects
not only some isolated business, but ANY area of human activity.
Simple as that.
It is a well known fact that by now Google is bent upon nothing
less than to "change the whole world".
Nothing less, nothing more.
What an arrogance! With these kinds of cunning and perverted minds?
With these kinds of techniques of utmost violence and deceit?
Who are these cunning perverts, that could even conceive of an
idea to run their so called web master help forums by being as cunning
as to not even pay a PENNY for it? With all the wealth available to
Google, it is so greedy that it can not even afford to hire a few
qualified professionals to provide an appropriate, to the point help
and to clarify things in precise and specific details?
Not to even publish the most critical information for everyone to see,
so everyone knows the "rules of the game" and is in equal position?
And how do they solve the problem instead?
Well, simple enough. Just get some bullies. Allow them to do anything they please,
including the most blatant and unceremonious self-marketing and unlimited insulting
Top it off with the ability to remove any evidence they wish,
and let them harass anyone who has any issues with Google, and in the most
blatant ways you can imagine, and they will do it all day long for you.
All for "free". You don't even have to pay a penny for it.
What a beauty of a business model. Even mafia would feel jealous!
And THAT is how Google keeps its "Positive User Experience" image,
that utter delusion of a slogan as meaningful as the estimated
number of pages on Google SERPs, which happens to be about 1000 times
off. LITERALLY, and there is as hard of an evidence of it available,
as it gets. Right in this very article. Just look around. It is there,
waiting to be discovered.
Simple enough for the mortals to comprehend?
But what happens instead, they created this circus, filled with these
puppets, or rather sharks, who are given the authority broad enough
to do virtually anything they please, regardless, up to the point of
removal of any thread they wish, which is not only strange, but simply
berserk. How would a respectable enterprise, especially of a size of
Google allow totally unauthorized individuals such a degree of freedom,
is simply mind boggling.
Most of them are plainly and blatantly milking these forums for so called
SEO business, and in quite unceremonious manner. None of them really know what
they are talking about because they are not Google employees and have never
been trained in anything related to search engine operation or system architecture.
They simply have no necessary technical background to even begin to comprehend
some of the issues.
Not a single one of these individuals really understands
the search engine mechanics and principles of operation and knows any
of Google's "proprietary" information, and could not POSSIBLY know.
Nevertheless, the response to their concoctions was removed within minutes.
Why would Google be so concerned with such an innocent message,
that simply refutes the totally ungrounded accusations and other utter nonsense?
It was simply clearly addressing all the lies and concoctions, point by point,
posted by one of the most outrageously behaving bullies around, whose nick is
Autocrat, which is bad enough in itself, and whose favicon reads
"Kiss My Wookie".
This criminally minded despicable individual is regularly involved in
continuous abuse of webmasters, that simply came to these forums for
some answer, outrageous harassments, defamation and slander and you name it.
How would the individuals with this kind of mentality be even allowed to participate
on these forums escapes any imagination.
What kind of "help" these kinds of people are capable of providing to
webmasters, whose livelihood depends on whether Google does its job in
a honest and decent manner and on a professional level?
And yet, HIS rotten concoctions were left intact, but response to
it, clearly addressing that garbage, point by point was removed.
What seems to be a problem, dear Google?
You seem to be getting WAY too concerned about such an innocent thing.
Compared to the harassments and abuse on record by your so called
top contributors, bullying people left and right all day long,
this kind of response is an angels song. And yet you IMMEDIATELY
Not only that. But you even close that thread, leaving these ugly
concoctions intact and remove the response to it.
Not only that. But you even go as far as to BLOCK THE ACCOUNT?
Jesus Christ! Have mercy on these people. They verily know not
what they are doing. Or DO they?
And what does Google hope to achieve with this most blatant
and most arrogant form of destruction of evidence possible even
in principle? Any clue, dear Google?
And yes, you won't be disappointed reading some of his masterpieces.
Probably the most appropriate representation of what these so called
help forums for webmasters are all about. VERY representative I'd say.
Well, if Google thinks it can simply harass and slander people and
then simply remove the evidence of these ugly orgies, conducted by
these sick sadists, they are a little bit naive.
Do they hope that these issues are simply going to go away,
by some magic power of evil they are willing to engage every step
of the way, no matter what it takes? Sure, with their extensive
system of censorship and suppression of information, Google IS
capable of suppressing the information in quite unprecedented ways.
And, combined with utter horror, experienced by anyone, who hopes
to show up in Google index, they immediately remove any information
that sheds a true light on what this monstrocity called Google is,
the odds of any compromising information about Google to see the light
of day are as slim as it gets. But...
The punch line of the harassment orgies on Google webmasters forums
may go as far as destruction of evidence, just as happened
in case of several threads addressing the issues
of the most unprecedented behavior of google search engine,
wild, and totally unexplainable gyrations of number of pages indexed,
disappearance of page views resulting from Google search,
disappearance of entries from "Top search queries" from SERPs,
and several other most unprecedented aspects of Google search
Those threads provided specific evidence of fact in form of
screen shots and other references to statistics and various logs.
They are included here for everyone to see and make up their
As it has been observed on numerous cases, after these,
pardon for expression, sadists, which is probably the most
appropriate term to describe some of those "Top Contributors"
and "Bionic posters", had enough fun of insulting,
humiliating and harassing someone, they simply unceremoniously
remove the entire threads with all the articles so there is no
trace of any of it left on record.
Furthermore, any mentioning of Google webmaster forums threads
related to totally unexplainable behavior of Google search
engine on various blogs, would inevitably cause the removal of
those articles from those blogs.
This has been observed on several blogs and corresponding
log entries were made and saved for future references.
Those removals align with Google viewing the article you are
It is simply impossible to even begin to comprehend the amount
of destruction of evidence on these forums without conducting
a detailed investigation.
Apparently some people think that destroying evidence from
all sorts of places is the way to address these issues.
They engage in these massive orgies of most blatant insults
and harassment, trying to hijack the threads with continuous,
and totally inappropriate "explanations", that happen to have
basically nothing to do with the exact issues, raised on these
threads, trying to create some kind of "majority opinion".
Little do they realize or care that Truth is not decided by
majority opinion. Ever.
Following are the archive copies of threads, removed from
google webmaster forums.
The site owners may use Google webmaster tools to keep
track of their sites and observe various statistics, etc.
One of things the webmasters can do is to see which particular
queries appeared in Google SERPs for these sites and in which
position. That means, if some query is listed, it was indeed
performed and it did appear in some position on SERPs.
What was found regarding several Programmer's Goldmine sites,
is that if you perform the same search queries again, you won't
be able to find any references to these sites on ANY SERPs,
in any position.
This fact alone is evidence enough to indicate the manipulation
of search results.
Within hours after publication of reference to the article
you are reading, and subsequent view of it by the Google personnel
on July 9, 2009 from the Google World Headquarters in Mountain View,
California, USA, all the page views, resulting from Google searches,
have rapidly stopped.
Such a behavior is simply impossible in a normally functioning system
without manual intervention.
Even in the most drastic cases, when the entire site is removed
from the Google index for whatever reason, it takes
several months for Google search engine to completely remove
the references to the sites of comparable size.
So, if people perform searches during that time, they will still
be able to find the articles from that site.
But in this case, it all happened
literally overnight, which is in itself an evidence of manipulation
via manual intervention into normal workings of
Google search engine.
After Google employees from their Mountain View, California, USA
office viewed the article you are reading, on July 9, 2009,
a totally new Google Miracle was observed:
all page views on Programmer's Goldmine sites,
resulting from google searches simply disappeared. All at once.
For no reason at all. There was nothing done to any sites.
No new anything anywhere, and, boom! The Google Miracle!
And to this day, there are no article page views
as a result of performing searches on Google, which is simply
impossible under normal working conditions, considering the
usual traffic on these sites as a result of doing Google searches.
To date, we have seen so many of those miracles, and some
of them so far beyond any logic or reason, that it takes
quite some comprehension skills not to get completely
mind boggled by all sorts of things, well beyond comprehension.
This thread was the original thread describing the
unusual and unprecedented fluctuations of Google SERPs.
The entire thread has been deleted by "Top Contributor", Phil Payne.
The reason? "...because valuable volunteer time was being taken up
to no useful purpose. And my fingers are itching again."
Well, totally incorrect search results are simply of no interest
to these people, even though, for others, it may turn out
to be the issue of life and death to their business.
In this thread, the issues of dramatic differences in search
results were discussed with Top Contributors.
He was asked: If that "volunteer" time was so valuable,
how come Google does not pay a penny for it?
Secondly, If Google does consider these forums of ANY value,
how come they did not hire the competent professionals to
handle these forums on appropriate level?
You can view the fully tagged version of
Google Index Drops Like a Rock thread
to make up your own mind on what it might mean to you,
especially if you are competent enough and can understand
some technical details involved.
thread was created to discuss the wild and totally
unexplainable fluctuations in the number of articles on Google SERPs.
One of "Top Contributors", webado,
even posted a picture, as some kind of perverted "answer",
that tells more about Google
webmaster forums than anything else.
Does anyone in his clear mind expect Google to take ANY
responsibility for such outrageous demonstrations
of how little do they care about anything anybody has to say?
"Nah, it was not us. We don't have anything to
do with it. It was some volunteer".
Simple as that.
And if you know "how it works", you should be able to
finish their sentence: "oh, sure, we do use them all the
time to destroy any evidence of any kind of problems we
might have, hehehe".
Can you PROVE anything? Could this individual
be classified as authorized Google representative in legal terms?
Guess what... "Little do we care if you even exist
for all practical purposes!".
And that is
the bottom line of all this Google zombification phenomenon.
- Email: preciseinfo [atsign] mail [dothere] ru
Pushing this button helps seeing this site without ads.